Bank of Stockton v. Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc.

244 Cal. Rptr. 744 (1988)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bank of Stockton v. Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc.

California Court of Appeal
244 Cal. Rptr. 744 (1988)

Facts

In 1981, The Bank of Stockton (Bank) (plaintiff) issued a loan to a walnut-growing business called Bella-Farms Partnership (Bella-Farms). The Bank did not secure the loan. Bella-Farms was a member of an agricultural marketing association called Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. (Diamond) (defendant). The members, including Bella-Farms, would give walnuts to Diamond to sell and then would receive proceeds called “member proceeds.” After the Bank’s loan, Diamond loaned Bella-Farms money and took a security interest in Bella-Farms’s 1983 walnut-crop member proceeds. Diamond filed a financing statement. Thereafter, Bella-Farms could not timely repay the Bank. The Bank agreed to renegotiate the loan and, at that time, took a security interest in Bella-Farms’s 1983 walnut crop and its proceeds. The Bank filed the requisite financing statements. Before Bella-Farms harvested the 1983 walnut crop, the Bank and Diamond learned of each other’s interest. Diamond and the Bank agreed that the crop could be delivered to Diamond and marketed. The agreement stated that each party reserved all rights and claims with respect to the 1983 crop and its proceeds. However, the agreement also stated that the transfer of the physical possession of the crop to Diamond will not change the parties’ rights and duties. When Diamond received the crop, it sold the walnuts and created member proceeds. The Bank sued seeking a determination of the parties’ competing claims to the member proceeds. The trial court ruled for the Bank.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Blease, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership