Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Bank of Texas v. VR Electric, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals
276 S.W.3d 671 (2008)


Facts

A bookkeeper for VR Electric, Inc. (VR) (plaintiff) left an unsigned check on the front counter in VR’s office for Terry Viohl, VR’s president, to sign. The same day, an outside contractor’s employee, Anthony Burlew, took the check from the office and endorsed it to himself by signing Viohl’s name. Burlew subsequently endorsed the check to Frank Mata (defendant), a car dealer. Mata deposited the check into his own account. The Bank of Texas (Bank) (defendant), with whom VR had its checking account, processed and paid the check through an automated Federal Reserve system without authenticating the signature. When VR learned that the check had been cashed, VR requested the return of the funds to its account and notified the Bank of the forgery. The Bank refused to credit VR’s account. VR filed suit against the Bank and Mata. At trial, one Bank employee testified that the Bank had a verbal policy whereby signatures processed through the automated system were not manually verified for checks less than $100,000. Another employee testified that the threshold verification amount was $250,000. The jury found that the Bank had acted in good faith but that the occurrence was caused by the negligence of all three parties. VR moved to disregard the jury’s finding that the Bank acted in good faith. The trial court granted VR’s motion. The Bank moved to disregard the jury’s finding that the Bank’s negligence was a contributing factor. The trial court denied the Bank’s motion and awarded VR damages for the amount of the check. The Bank appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Alcala, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.