Bank One, Louisiana v. Mr. Dean MV
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
293 F.3d 830 (2002)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
BargeCarib, Inc. entered into a time-charter agreement with Offshore Supply Ships, Inc. (Offshore) to use Offshore’s towboat, which came to be named the Mr. Dean (defendant), to aid in BargeCarib’s shipments of its products. BargeCarib took possession of and began using the Mr. Dean on August 15, 1996. In May of 1997, Offshore sold the Mr. Dean to Global Towing, LLC (Global). Global succeeded Offshore as BargeCarib’s counterparty on the charter agreement. Global financed the purchase of the Mr. Dean with a loan from an entity that later became Bank One, Louisiana NA (Bank One) (plaintiff). To secure the loan, Global gave Bank One a mortgage on the Mr. Dean, which Bank One duly recorded on May 21, 1997. In 1998, Global’s owner, Michael Blake, personally guaranteed Global’s indebtedness. In July 1997, Global breached its charter agreement by failing to make the Mr. Dean or another towboat available to BargeCarib. Later, Global defaulted on its loan with Bank One, and Blake refused to honor his guarantee. Bank One brought an in rem suit against the Mr. Dean, seeking a forced sale. Because any forced sale was unlikely to generate enough proceeds to cover both Bank One’s outstanding loan balance and BargeCarib’s damages for breach of the charter agreement, BargeCarib intervened in Bank One’s suit, seeking a judgment prioritizing BargeCarib’s claim. The district court determined that Bank One’s mortgage had priority because Bank One had perfected its mortgage before Global breached its charter agreement with BargeCarib. BargeCarib appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Garwood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.