From our private database of 34,000+ case briefs...
Banks v. Dretke
United States Supreme Court
540 U.S. 668 (2004)
Banks (defendant) was accused of murdering a 16-year-old during a car jacking. Evidence was presented at trial that Banks had previously attacked a family member, and Banks admitted to helping someone get a gun. Banks did not have a criminal record. A paid informant named Farr testified that Banks used a gun to facilitate robberies. The prosecution did not inform the defense that Farr was a paid informant, despite claiming at trial and other proceedings that nothing was withheld.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 607,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 607,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 34,000 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.