Barber v. Ponte

772 F.2d 996 (1985)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...

Barber v. Ponte

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

772 F.2d 996 (1985)

Facts

James Barber (defendant) was convicted in state court. Barber consistently argued that his Sixth Amendment right was violated because the venire did not adequately reflect the proportion of young adults in the community. Barber defined young adults as people aged 18 to 34. Barber presented only statistical evidence reflecting the alleged disparity. Barber’s statistics showed that young adults comprised almost 38 percent of the population in the trial county. After exhausting state court remedies, Barber petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court denied Barber’s Sixth Amendment argument. Barber appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The First Circuit panel reversed, finding that young adults were a sufficiently cohesive group that must be adequately represented in venires. The First Circuit then decided to rehear Barber’s Sixth Amendment argument en banc.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)

Dissent (Bownes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 36,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership