From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Barber v. Ponte
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
772 F.2d 996 (1985)
Facts
James Barber (defendant) was convicted in state court. Barber consistently argued that his Sixth Amendment right was violated because the venire did not adequately reflect the proportion of young adults in the community. Barber defined young adults as people aged 18 to 34. Barber presented only statistical evidence reflecting the alleged disparity. Barber’s statistics showed that young adults comprised almost 38 percent of the population in the trial county. After exhausting state court remedies, Barber petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court denied Barber’s Sixth Amendment argument. Barber appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The First Circuit panel reversed, finding that young adults were a sufficiently cohesive group that must be adequately represented in venires. The First Circuit then decided to rehear Barber’s Sixth Amendment argument en banc.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)
Dissent (Bownes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.