Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Bard v. Bath Iron Works Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
590 A.2d 152 (Me. 1991)


Facts

In 1983, Leon E. Bard Jr. (plaintiff) began working as a quality-assurance inspector for Bath Iron Works Corporation (BIW) (defendant). Bard began suspecting there were flaws in BIW’s quality-assurance process that were in violation of certain provisions in BIW’s contracts with the United States Navy (Navy). Bard raised this issue with his supervisors and the Navy inspectors. Bard’s last pay increase was in January 1984. In January 1986, Bard received a written warning from BIW after BIW received numerous complaints about Bard’s poor performance and attitude. In September 1986, BIW terminated Bard’s employment on the grounds that Bard had deliberately restricted output and created a nuisance. Bard sued BIW, arguing that his termination was retaliatory in violation of Maine’s Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (Act). After trial, BIW moved for judgment against Bard on the whistleblower claim. The trial court granted judgment in favor of BIW. Bard appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 251,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.