Barker v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
599 P.2d 1349 (1979)
Kenneth L. Barker (defendant) opened a checking account with the First Wyoming Bank of Rawlins (the Rawlins Bank). Barker then had the Rawlins Bank prepare a “customer’s draft” so that a Montana bank could wire $30,000 into his Rawlins Bank account. However, Barker had no active bank account in a Montana bank. The following day, Barker cashed a $500 check on his account at the Rawlins Bank without bank employees verifying that the $30,000 had been deposited from the Montana bank. Shortly thereafter, the Montana bank returned the customer’s draft unpaid. Barker was charged with, and convicted of, obtaining property by false pretenses in violation of Wyoming statute § 6-3-106. Barker appealed, arguing that the state’s insufficient funds statute, § 6-3-110, precluded his conviction under § 6-3-106.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rose, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.