Barnard v. Monongahela Natural Gas Co.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
65 A. 801 (1907)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Daniel and Elizabeth Barnard (plaintiffs) owned a farm in Pennsylvania, and James Barnard owned an adjoining farm. Monongahela Natural Gas Co. (the company) (defendant) held a lease on both farms for the exclusive right to drill for gas, with the company paying the landowners for the gas it extracted. The company drilled a new well on James’s land that was close to the boundary with Daniel and Elizabeth’s land and extracted gas from that well. The company later drilled a new well on Daniel and Elizabeth’s land that was close to the well on James’s land, but the well failed to produce any gas. Daniel and Elizabeth sued the company seeking an injunction and an accounting, alleging that the well on James’s land had been fraudulently placed close to their land so as to draw gas from underneath their property over to the well located on James’s property.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McIlvaine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.