Barnard v. Monongahela Natural Gas Co.

65 A. 801 (1907)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Barnard v. Monongahela Natural Gas Co.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
65 A. 801 (1907)

Play video

Facts

Daniel and Elizabeth Barnard (plaintiffs) owned a farm in Pennsylvania, and James Barnard owned an adjoining farm. Monongahela Natural Gas Co. (the company) (defendant) held a lease on both farms for the exclusive right to drill for gas, with the company paying the landowners for the gas it extracted. The company drilled a new well on James’s land that was close to the boundary with Daniel and Elizabeth’s land and extracted gas from that well. The company later drilled a new well on Daniel and Elizabeth’s land that was close to the well on James’s land, but the well failed to produce any gas. Daniel and Elizabeth sued the company seeking an injunction and an accounting, alleging that the well on James’s land had been fraudulently placed close to their land so as to draw gas from underneath their property over to the well located on James’s property.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McIlvaine, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership