Barnett v. Barnett

67 S.W.3d 107 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Barnett v. Barnett

Texas Supreme Court
67 S.W.3d 107 (2001)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Christopher Barnett (defendant) and Marleen Barnett (plaintiff) were married. During the marriage, Christopher obtained a life-insurance policy through his employer and paid the premiums with payroll deductions. Christopher and Marleen separated and initiated divorce proceedings. Christopher changed the beneficiary of his life insurance to his mother, Dora Barnett (defendant), and executed a new will in which he gave his entire estate to Dora. Before the divorce was concluded, however, Christopher died. The life-insurance proceeds were approximately $170,000. Marleen sued Christopher’s estate and Dora, arguing that the proceeds were community property and that Christopher committed fraud on the community by changing his beneficiary of community property to Dora. Dora argued that the life-insurance policies were separate property and that even if they were community property, Marleen’s community-property interest and the claim for fraud were preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The trial court held that ERISA preempted Marleen’s community-property interest. The court of appeals reversed. Dora appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Owen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership