Barnidge v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
101 F.2d 295 (1939)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Under the Historic Sites Act (act), the secretary of the interior (secretary) (plaintiff) determined that certain land in St. Louis, Missouri, possessed exceptional value in commemorating the history of the United States and was a historic site. The Spanish colonial office where the first territory of the Upper Louisiana Purchase was transferred to the United States during Thomas Jefferson’s administration was located on the land. Also located on the land was the government house at which the Spanish commandant in St. Louis transferred possession of upper Louisiana to United States Army Captain Stoddard as France’s delegated representative, who then, as the agent of the United States, took formal possession of the Louisiana Purchase. The Spanish, French, and American flags were raised successively over the site within a 24-hour period. The land also included the places where the first civil government west of the Mississippi was established; the Santa Fe, the Oregon, and other trails originated; Lewis and Clark prepared for their exploration trip; and the Dred Scott case was tried. Following the secretary’s determination, the president issued an executive order directing the secretary to acquire the land to develop and preserve it for the purpose of the act. The secretary then filed a petition in federal court for condemnation of the land. The lower court approved the condemnation in eminent-domain proceedings. Barnidge (defendant), one of the landowners, appealed, alleging that the purpose for which the land was being acquired was not a public use.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gardner, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.