From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...
Barnum v. Williams
Oregon Supreme Court
264 Or. 71, 504 P.2d 122 (1972)
Facts
On a rainy day, Lawrence Barnum (plaintiff) was driving his motorcycle uphill and rounding an extremely sharp curve to his left. Homer Williams (defendant) was driving downhill. Williams, upon seeing Barnum, and apprehensive that he may hit Barnum, applied the brakes. Nevertheless, Williams slid into Barnum. The impact happened on or near the center line on Barnum’s side of the road. Barnum sued. The trial court instructed the jury that, in considering statutory negligence (e.g., a violation of law such as crossing the center line), it had the option not to treat the violation of law as negligence if, under the circumstances, the statute should not be obeyed for safety reasons. The jury found for Williams. Barnum appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Denecke, J.)
Dissent (McAllister, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.