Barr v. City of Sinton

295 S.W.3d 287 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Barr v. City of Sinton

Texas Supreme Court
295 S.W.3d 287 (2009)

DC

Facts

In 1998, Pastor Barr (plaintiff) started Philemon Restoration Homes, a halfway-house ministry that offered housing and biblical instruction to parolees and probationers transitioning back into society after serving time for low-level offenses. Philemon’s guidelines emphasized that it was a biblical ministry, not a social-services agency, and participants were required to abide by biblical principles and participate in daily prayer and Bible studies. Shortly after Barr presented information to the city council about Philemon, the council passed an ordinance that prohibited correctional or rehabilitation facilities within 1,000 feet of residential areas, schools, and community facilities. The ordinance effectively eliminated any area in the small town that Philemon could operate, and a city manager later acknowledged that it was intended to target Barr and Philemon. Barr sued the city of Sinton (defendant), alleging that the ordinance violated the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act (TRFRA). The trial court ruled for the city, and Barr appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership