Barras v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
685 F.3d 1269 (2012)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Lacy Barras (plaintiff) signed a bank-services agreement (BSA) when she opened her account at Branch Banking & Trust Company (BB&T) (defendant). Barras later filed a federal class-action suit charging BB&T with unfair banking practices. BB&T moved for a district-court order enforcing the BSA’s arbitration clause. The district court denied BB&T’s motion, ruling that the arbitration clause forced Barras to waive her right to arbitrate class-based claims, in violation of a South Carolina statute prohibiting such waivers. BB&T appealed to the Eleventh Circuit. While that appeal was pending, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempted California’s version of the South Carolina anti-waiver statute on which the district court based its ruling. The Eleventh Circuit ordered the district court to reconsider that ruling in light of the Supreme Court’s decision. On remand, the district court once again denied BB&T’s motion. This time the court ruled that an obscure BSA provision buried many pages away from the BSA’s arbitration clause unconscionably shifted all of BB&T’s arbitration costs, win or lose, to Barras. BB&T appealed once more to the Eleventh Circuit, which noted that the BSA included a severability clause.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barkett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.