Barrett v. Virginia State Bar

611 S.E.2d 375 (2005)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
B
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Barrett v. Virginia State Bar

Supreme Court of Virginia
611 S.E.2d 375 (2005)

SC

Facts

Timothy Barrett and Valerie Rhudy were married with children. The couple separated. Barrett was a lawyer admitted to practice in Virginia. Before Rhudy was represented by counsel in the divorce, Barrett sent numerous emails to her. Several of the emails stated that Barrett still loved Rhudy and asked Rhudy to return to the marital home. Two emails, however, referenced the couple’s imminent divorce proceeding. The first of these emails stated that, under Virginia law, Barrett would not have to pay spousal support but rather would be awarded custody of the children, and Rhudy would have to pay spousal support. The second email stated that Rhudy had no case against Barrett and that Barrett would obtain a fault-based divorce against Rhudy. The second email also stated that Rhudy’s legal costs would likely exceed $30,000. The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (Board) (defendant) found that Barrett’s emails violated Rule 4.3(b) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 4.3(b) prohibited a lawyer from giving legal advice to an unrepresented individual if the individual’s interests were likely to be in conflict with the interests of the lawyer’s client. The Board issued an order suspending Barrett’s law license for three years. Barrett appealed, arguing that Rule 4.3 was not intended to prohibit communication between a husband and a wife.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Agee, J.)

Dissent (Keenan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Family Law
Legal Ethics

Key Terms