Barron v. Martin-Marietta Corp.

868 F. Supp. 1203 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Barron v. Martin-Marietta Corp.

United States District Court for the Northern District of California
868 F. Supp. 1203 (1994)

Facts

On the morning of August 23, 1990, Billy Barron and two other workers (Morning Workers) (plaintiffs) loaded a single missile canister manufactured by Martin-Marietta Corporation (MMC) (defendant) into magazine storage at a weapons station in California. On the afternoon of the same day, three more workers (Afternoon Workers) (plaintiffs) loaded six additional missile canisters, half of which were manufactured by MMC and the other half by another company, IMI. Both the Morning Workers and the Afternoon Workers smelled fumes leaking from the canisters during unloading and allegedly suffered severe physical and psychological injuries as a result. An investigation by the United States Navy suggested that the workers had most likely been exposed to toluene, which was present in the canisters. The investigation also determined that the levels of toluene in two of the MMC canisters loaded in the afternoon were low, and suggested that the canisters may have leaked. The Afternoon Workers and Morning Workers brought an action for negligence against MMC, claiming that their injuries had been caused by exposure to MMC’s canisters. MMC brought a motion for summary judgment, arguing that both the Morning and Afternoon Workers had failed to show that MMC had caused the alleged injuries.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership