Barton v. State Bar of California
California Supreme Court
289 P. 818 (1930)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Attorney Daniel Barton (plaintiff) posted a newspaper advertisement offering legal services. The State Bar of California (bar) (defendant) brought charges against Barton for violating Rule 2 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibited attorneys from soliciting employment by advertisement. The purpose of this prohibition was to protect the public’s perception of the legal profession. Barton challenged the bar’s charges, arguing that Rule 2 was an unreasonable regulation because it restricted lawyers, who practiced in a competitive business environment, from advertising their practice like other businesses.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.