From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Barton v. United States District Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
410 F.3d 1104 (2005)
Andrew Barton and others (the claimants) (plaintiffs) sued pharmaceutical manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline (defendant) claiming injuries related to withdrawal from the drug Paxil. The law firm that represented the claimants had posted a questionnaire on the internet seeking to “gather information” about potential class members. Entitled “PAXIL WITHDRAWAL LITIGATION INITIAL CONTACT,” the questionnaire asked for extensive information from Paxil users or their loved ones about their experiences using the drug and symptoms. At the end, the person filling out the form had to check a “yes” box to submit it to the law firm. A disclaimer stated that the person was not requesting legal advice and did not form an attorney-client relationship by submitting the questionnaire. GlaxoSmithKline sought the questionnaires that four of the five initial claimants completed to compare with their discovery responses. The claimants objected on attorney-client-privilege grounds. The district court found that the attorney-client privilege did not apply, reasoning that the disclaimer of an attorney-client relationship was also a disclaimer of confidentiality even though “confidentiality” did not appear, and that checking the “yes” box waived any privilege. The court essentially concluded that the claimants’ attorneys could not use a disclaimer to protect themselves then claim privilege and ordered the questionnaires disclosed. The claimants appealed, seeking a writ of mandamus to prevent the disclosure.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kleinfeld, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.