Baseball Publishing Co. v. Bruton
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
18 N.E.2d 362 (1938)
- Written by Melanie Moultry, JD
Facts
Baseball Publishing Company (BPC) (plaintiff) entered a contract with Bruton (defendant) to place an advertising sign on the wall of a building Bruton owned. The contract was titled “Lease No. ____.” It gave BPC the exclusive right and privilege to advertise on Bruton’s building for one year, in exchange for $25. The contract also gave BPC an annual, renewable option for up to four years, for $25 per year. Bruton signed the contract, but did not seal it. BPC accepted the contract on November 10, 1934, by sending Bruton a check for $25. Bruton returned the check. BPC nonetheless erected and maintained a sign on the building and sent Bruton checks for $25 in November 1935 and November 1936. Bruton returned both checks and removed the sign on February 23, 1937. BPC sued for specific performance, claiming that the contract was a lease. The judge found that the contract was a license and ordered specific performance, damages, and costs. Bruton appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lummus, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.