Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Basko v. Sterling Drug

416 F.2d 417 (1969)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Basko v. Sterling Drug

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

416 F.2d 417 (1969)

Facts

Lydia Basko (plaintiff) suffered from lupus erythematosus and, from 1953 to 1961, took three different drugs (Aralen, Atabrine, and Triquin) to treat it. These drugs were all manufactured by a division of Sterling Drug Co. (defendant). In 1956, a few years after taking the drugs, Basko experienced blurred vision. This condition continued to worsen, and Basko became almost completely blind. Basko brought suit against Sterling Drug as a result of these side effects, arguing that Sterling Drug failed to adequately warn her of possible side effects of the drugs. During the trial, Basko’s medical expert testified that her side effects were likely caused by drugs made from chloroquine, and Aralen and Triquin contain chloroquine ingredients. Prior to Basko’s use of these drugs, there had been reports of blurred vision in patients who took chloroquine, and Sterling Drug was aware of these reports when they occurred. However, Sterling Drug contended there was no evidence of retinal damage until 1957, after Basko began experiencing her symptoms. However, Basko took Triquin from 1959 to 1961. In 1962 Aralen and Triquin added warnings to its product card indicating retinal changes, although rare, could occur. The jury, on the issue of causation, was instructed to find for Basko if the jury determined one or more of the drugs caused her blindness. At the end of the trial, the jury found for Sterling Drug. Basko appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership