Bass v. Boetel & Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
217 N.W.2d 804 (1974)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Carl Bass (plaintiff) rented a property for operation of a billiards parlor. The lease granted the landlord permission to reenter the premises without any notice upon any default by Bass. Boetel & Company (defendant) assumed the lease as landlord, and around that time Bass had become three months delinquent in rent payments. Boetel changed the locks on the premises and removed and detained much of Bass’s equipment. Boetel did not give Bass written notice to quit or serve him with any legal processes prior to these acts. Bass brought suit seeking damages for his confiscated equipment. The district court did not submit any specific jury instructions regarding damages. The jury awarded Bass $12,000 for the taking and detention of his equipment. Boetel appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Spencer, J.)
Concurrence (Boslaugh, J.)
Dissent (Newton, J.)
Dissent (Clinton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.