Bates v. Cashman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
119 N.E. 663 (1918)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Bates (plaintiff) and Cashman (defendant) entered a contract whereby Cashman agreed to purchase the stocks and bonds of Newburyport Cordage Company. These stocks and bonds represented control over real property. During negotiations, Bates represented that Newburyport Cordage Company owned a right of way, which increased the value of the real property substantially. Although Bates was unaware, this representation was untrue. Bates later brought suit to enforce the contract. Cashman argued that he was induced to sign the contract based on false representations by Bates, and that he was therefore not obligated to perform under the contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rugg, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.