Bates v. Superior Court

749 P.2d 1367 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Bates v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court
749 P.2d 1367 (1988)

Facts

Gloria Bates was a resident of Michigan in 1975 when she was injured in an automobile accident in Illinois and made claims for her medical expenses with Nationwide, her insurer, through its Michigan office. Nationwide provided Gloria benefits for her accident-related medical treatment. Gloria later moved to Arizona, and Nationwide continued to pay her medical bills until her Michigan agent retired in 1985 and it transferred her claim file to its home office in Ohio and Gloria was asked to be reevaluated. A doctor in Phoenix determined that Gloria’s condition no longer required medical treatment, so Nationwide’s Ohio claims staff quit paying Gloria’s medical bills. Gloria sued Nationwide in Arizona for breach of contract and bad-faith insurance practices after her requests for reconsideration were denied. Michigan did not recognize a cause of action for bad-faith insurance practices, but Arizona and Ohio did. Nationwide argued that Michigan law should control because it was the state with the most significant contacts to the claim. Gloria argued that Ohio and Arizona had the most significant contacts with the claim. The trial court concluded that Michigan had the most significant contacts and granted partial summary judgment for Nationwide. Gloria’s motion for reconsideration was denied, and she appealed. After the court of appeals denied jurisdiction, Gloria appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Feldman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership