Baugh v. Cuprum S.A. De C.V.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
730 F.3d 701 (2013)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
John Baugh (plaintiff) was using a ladder manufactured by Cuprum S.A. de C.V. (Cuprum) (defendant) when the ladder collapsed. Baugh suffered a severe brain injury as a result. However, there were no eyewitnesses to the accident. Baugh’s wife brought suit against Cuprum on Baugh’s behalf. At trial, Baugh’s injury rendered him unable to testify. Cuprum sought to bring a replica of the collapsed ladder into the courtroom. Cuprum stated that the replica ladder would only be used for demonstrative purposes to explain expert testimony, and that it would not be substitutive evidence. The district court overruled Baugh’s objection to Cuprum’s use of the replica ladder on the ground that it was only demonstrative evidence. The district judge allowed the replica ladder to be displayed in the courtroom, but it was not admitted into evidence. During deliberations, the jury requested access to the replica ladder. Over Baugh’s objection, the judge permitted the replica ladder to be sent to the jury room. The judge instructed the jury that it could fully examine the replica ladder, but not reconstruct the accident. The jury found in favor of Cuprum. Baugh appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hamilton, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.