Baxter v. City of Belleville, Illinois
United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
720 F. Supp. 720 (1989)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Charles Baxter (plaintiff) applied for a permit to lease a building in the City of Belleville (city) (defendant) to use as hospice housing for people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or the more progressive condition of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). In zoning hearings and city-council meetings, Baxter was questioned about the house’s proximity to local schools, the residents’ potential homosexual tendencies and drug use, sanitation plans, and the residents’ potential effect on property values. The aldermen for the ward that housed the property supported Baxter, but the city voted to deny Baxter’s permit. The city had never voted against a permit supported by a property’s aldermen. Baxter filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, claiming a violation of the Fair Housing Act (FHA). [Editor’s Note: The casebook excerpt incorrectly identifies the court as the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.] Baxter asked for a preliminary injunction compelling the city to grant his permit. The city claimed that it denied the permit because it was unsure that Baxter could effectively operate the home. However, court testimony indicated that the city denied the permit due to concerns about the spread of HIV to the community. Evidence presented in court showed that HIV-positive people posed no risk of transmission to the larger community and that the city did not refer to or consult any medical authorities in making its permit decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stiehl, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.