From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Baxter v. Crosby
North Carolina Court of Appeals
257 S.E.2d 71 (1979)
A public-school teacher, Leona Baxter (plaintiff) attained the status of a career teacher under a North Carolina statute. The school principal asked Baxter to stop striking the orthopedically handicapped children in her classroom as a form of punishment. Baxter continued to strike the students in front of witnesses. The superintendent of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (school board) (defendant) sent a notice to Baxter, advising her of a recommendation made to the school board to dismiss her at the close of the school year. The grounds for the superintendent’s recommendation made clear in the notice included Baxter’s inadequate performance, insubordination, neglect of duty, and failure to comply with school-board requirements. Baxter requested review of the superintendent’s recommendation by a Professional Review Committee panel, which conducted a hearing and issued a majority report recommending reinstatement with back pay as well as a minority report recommending dismissal. In spite of the panel’s majority report, the superintendent submitted a second recommendation to the school board that Baxter be dismissed. The school board’s chairperson sent Baxter notice that she was entitled to a hearing. The school board held the hearing, heard hearsay evidence to investigate the claims, and unanimously voted to terminate Baxter for the reasons stated in the original notice. Baxter filed an action in the state court to appeal the school board’s decision and alleged that the school board violated her constitutional due-process rights during its administrative proceedings. The trial court affirmed the school board’s order. Baxter appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.