Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Washington
12 P.2d 409 (1932)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Baxter (plaintiff) bought a car from St. John Motors (St. John). The car was manufactured by Ford Motor Co. (Ford) (defendant). Catalogs distributed by Ford about the car contained statements that "[a]ll of the new Ford Cars have a Triplex shatter-proof glass windshield" and that the glass was "so made that it will not fly or shatter under the hardest impact." One day while Baxter was driving, a pebble cracked his windshield, causing pieces of glass to go into his eye and resulting in the loss of one of his eyes. Baxter sued Ford and St. John. At the close of Baxter's case, the trial court directed a verdict for the defendants. In doing so, the trial court refused to admit as evidence sales catalogues Ford had given to St. John containing the warranties that the windshields in the model that Baxter bought were shatter-proof. Baxter appealed to the Supreme Court of Washington.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Herman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
