Baxter v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California Supreme Court
19 Cal. 3d 461, 138 Cal. Rptr. 315, 563 P.2d 871 (1977)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
At age 16, Andre Baxter underwent general anesthesia at Huntington Memorial Hospital in preparation for a diagnostic procedure and possible surgery. Due to complications, he was comatose for four months and 14 neurosurgeries were performed on him. When he woke, he was the mental equivalent of a three-year-old child. He was also blind, hearing impaired, and partially paralyzed. Andre and his parents (plaintiffs) sued the hospital and attending doctors (defendants). Andre’s parents sought damages for the loss of his support, comfort, protection, society, and pleasure (i.e., loss of consortium). The trial court sustained demurrers from several of the defendants on the loss-of-consortium claim, and the court of appeal denied relief to Andre’s parents. Andre’s parents appealed to the California Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tobriner, C.J.)
Dissent (Mosk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.