Bay Casino, LLC v. M/V Royal Empress
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
20 F. Supp. 2d 440 (1998)
- Written by Alex Ruskell, JD
Facts
Bay Casino, LLC (Bay) (plaintiff) entered into a bareboat charter with SeaCo Ltd. to charter the M/V Royal Express (defendant), a vessel, for three years. Bay intended to use the vessel as a floating gambling facility. Under the agreement, Bay had to post in a conspicuous place in the vessel that the vessel was owned by SeaCo and under demise charter to Bay. Bay also had full use and exclusive control of the vessel and had to maintain the vessel at its own expense. SeaCo had to provide skills, knowledge, and financing and got a share of the anticipated profits and consulting fees. The agreement referred several times to SeaCo as “owner” and Bay Casino as “charterer.” After SeaCo allegedly defaulted on the agreement, Bay sued for an arrest and lien upon the vessel. SeaCo moved to vacate the arrest and lien by arguing that Bay could not obtain a lien on the vessel because their agreement should be viewed as a joint venture instead of a charter party.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.