Bayerische Motorenwerke AG (BMW) and BMW Nederland BV v. Ronald Karel Deenik
European Union Court of Justice
Case No. C-63/97 (1999)
- Written by Jody Stuart, JD
Facts
Bayerische Motorenwerke AG and BMW Nederland BV (collectively, BMW) (plaintiffs) owned the BMW trademark for its cars. BMW marketed its cars through a network of dealers, who had to meet BMW’s standards before joining the network and using the BMW mark. Ronald Karel Deenik (defendant) was a garage owner who repaired and maintained BMW cars and sold secondhand BMW cars in the Netherlands. Deenik used the BMW mark in advertisements for his repair and maintenance of BMW cars and in advertisements for the resale of secondhand BMW cars. BMW filed suit in the Netherlands, accusing Deenik of illegally using the BMW mark in advertisements. The national court requested a preliminary ruling from the European Union Court of Justice on the interpretation of Articles 5–7 of the Trade Marks Directive.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.