Bayou Fleet Partnership v. Dravo Basic Materials Company, Inc.

106 F.3d 691 (1997)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...

Bayou Fleet Partnership v. Dravo Basic Materials Company, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

106 F.3d 691 (1997)

Facts

Dravo Basic Materials Company, Inc., (Dravo) (defendant) operated an aggregate yard on land it leased from Neal Clulee through an oral lease. Dravo used the land to stockpile and sell limestone. Dravo constructed three limestone work bases on the property. These bases consisted of large piles of loose limestone that had been compacted onto a fabric liner to form a solid base on which tons of loose limestone could be stored. These work bases were very large, firmly attached to the land, and permanent, as only the loose limestone stored on top of the bases was sold. Clulee’s land was eventually sold through a sheriff’s sale to Bayou Fleet Partnership (Bayou Fleet) (plaintiff). Dravo and Bayou Fleet negotiated for a continuation of Dravo’s lease of the land, but they failed to come to an agreement, and Dravo decided that it would vacate the premises. Unbeknownst to Bayou Fleet, Dravo removed all of the loose limestone and the three limestone working bases from the property over one weekend. Dravo filed a declaratory judgment in state court seeking to be named the owner of all of the removed limestone. Bayou Fleet filed suit against Dravo for damages, and the two actions were consolidated in federal court. The district court held that Dravo was entitled to remove the loose limestone and the majority of the limestone in the working bases and that Dravo was therefore only liable to Bayou Fleet for a small portion of the limestone in the working bases that had become a component part of the property. Bayou Fleet and Dravo both appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Politz, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 36,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership