BC Tire Corp. v. GTE Directories Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
730 P.2d 726 (1986)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
BC Tire Corporation (BC Tire) (plaintiff) requested that GTE Directories Corporation (GTE) (defendant) publish an advertisement in the local phonebook and agreed to pay a monthly advertising fee. BC Tire completed and signed a GTE application form, which stated that publication of the advertisement would constitute acceptance of the application and that otherwise the application was not binding on the parties. The application also contained an exclusionary clause, stating that GTE would not be liable to BC Tire for damages resulting from a failure to publish an advertisement. GTE failed to include BC Tire’s advertisement in the phonebook. BC Tire sued GTE for breach of contract. GTE requested summary judgment on the grounds that there was no contract between the parties, and, if there was a contract, GTE’s liability was limited by the exclusionary clause. The trial court granted summary judgment for GTE and dismissed the action. BC Tire appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pekelis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.