Beale Street Development Corp. v. Miller

2003 WL 1618068 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Beale Street Development Corp. v. Miller

Tennessee Court of Appeals
2003 WL 1618068 (2003)

RW

Facts

Beale Street Development Corporation (BSDC) (plaintiff) gave George Miller (defendant) an option to buy property that Miller leased from BSDC. Miller could exercise the option by paying off the mortgage and any liens on the property. Miller and Curtis Calvin (plaintiff) later signed a sublease agreement that contained its own four-year purchase option. Calvin could trigger his option by agreeing to pay off the mortgage and tendering a $25,000 down payment to Miller, who would then buy the property from BSDC and resell it to Calvin. The sublease made no mention of nonmortgage liens on the property. Calvin subsequently informed Miller that he wanted to exercise his purchase option and that he expected Miller to pay off a nonmortage lien of $42,600 for unpaid taxes. Miller refused to go forward unless Calvin agreed to lift the tax lien. After his purchase option expired, Calvin intervened in ongoing litigation between BSDC and Miller to complain that Miller had unjustly prevented Calvin from exercising his purchase option. The trial court dismissed Calvin’s complaint, and Calvin appealed to the Tennessee Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Highers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership