Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Bean v. Ford

Supreme Court of California
82 P.3d 747 (2004)


Facts

Terrold Bean was placed in a foster home with Mr. and Mrs. Ford when he was two years old and lived with them throughout his childhood. The Fords did not attempt to adopt Bean. While she was alive, Mrs. Ford told a friend that she and Mr. Ford wanted to adopt Bean but did not think they could, for fear that Bean might be removed and placed in another foster home during the adoption process. After Mrs. Ford’s death, Bean kept a close relationship to Mr. Ford until Mr. Ford’s death. Mr. Ford was survived by a niece and nephew (plaintiffs), who petitioned the court to determine distribution of Mr. Ford’s estate. Bean (defendant) claimed an interest in the estate as an equitably adopted child. Under § 6454 of the probate code, a foster parent or step-parent may be considered a parent if there is a personal relationship with the child that begins when the child is a minor and lasts through the child’s and parent’s joint lifetimes, and if there is a legal barrier that prevents the foster or step-parent from legally adopting the child. Section 6455 of the probate code specifically states that it does not limit the application of the equitable adoption doctrine. The superior court found that Bean could not support an equitable adoption claim because there was no evidence that Ford intended to adopt Bean. The court of appeal affirmed, and Bean appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.