Beasley v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal
235 Cal. App. 3d 1407, 1 Cal. Rptr. 2d 459 (1991)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
A class-action lawsuit challenged Wells Fargo Bank’s (defendant) assessment of fees against its credit-card customers (plaintiffs) who failed to make timely payments or exceeded their credit limits and resulted in a judgment for the credit-card customers. A subsequent judgment required the bank to pay the credit-card customers their attorney fees and expenses based on California’s private attorney general statute—California Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5. The statute permits a fee award when: (1) the action enforces an important right affecting the public interest; (2) the general public or a large class has received a significant benefit; (3) the necessity and financial burden of private enforcement make the award appropriate; and (4) in the interest of justice, the fees should not be paid out of the recovery. The bank appealed and argued that the financial burden, interest of justice, and public interest criteria were lacking.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reardon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.