Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Beatty v. Baxter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
258 P.2d 626 (Okla. 1953)


Facts

James Hubbard owned a tract of land. In 1921, James executed an oil and gas lease on the land for a primary term of five years and for as long thereafter as oil or gas was produced. In James’s will, he devised half the land to Charles Hubbard and half to Fred Hubbard. The will was contested by James’s other children. The will contest was settled in 1925 by an agreement under which Fred conveyed to his siblings a mineral estate in the portion of the land the will purportedly left for Fred. The conveyances were for a period of 20 years “and as long thereafter as oil or gas [was] produced from said premises.” Fred also granted a reversionary interest in his estate to J.B. Beatty and Zella Beatty (plaintiffs). In 1945, the last producing well on Fred’s tract ceased production. The casing was not removed from the well, which was rehabilitated and began producing again in 1948. Additionally, a new well was drilled on Fred’s tract and began production in 1947. The Beattys brought suit against F.H. Baxter and other grantees of Fred’s siblings (defendants), seeking a declaratory judgment that the cessation of production reverted the mineral estate to the Beattys. The defendants argued that the cessation was temporary and that the rehabilitation of the well had been delayed due to wartime conditions. The defendants claimed that, as a result, their mineral interests did not revert to the Beattys. The trial court found in favor of the defendants. The Beattys appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Davison, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.