Beaty v. Commonweath

125 S.W.3d 196 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Beaty v. Commonweath

Kentucky Supreme Court
125 S.W.3d 196 (2003)

Play video

Facts

A police officer pulled over a vehicle driven by Roger Beaty (defendant). Beaty’s girlfriend, Marion Ann Hanks, was in the front passenger seat. Beaty failed a field sobriety test and was charged with driving under the influence of a substance other than alcohol. A search of Beaty’s person revealed bags of marijuana, cocaine, and drug paraphernalia. Inside the car, police officers found marijuana and alcohol in the front seat and glove compartment, and various items used to manufacture methamphetamine in the back seat and trunk. The Commonwealth of Kentucky (plaintiff) charged Beaty with nine counts, including manufacturing methamphetamine, possession of a controlled substance, and possession of a substance with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine. Hanks testified that she and Beaty had borrowed the car from its owner, Pamela Kuhl, and that neither Hanks nor Beaty was aware of the methamphetamine items in the back seat or trunk. During a trial, Beaty sought to introduce evidence that Kuhl wanted Hanks to be charged with the methamphetamine offenses. Beaty claimed that Kuhl planted the methamphetamine-related items in her car so that Hanks would be charged with the crime because Kuhl thought Hanks was secretly having an affair with her boyfriend. The court excluded the evidence. Beaty was convicted. Beaty appealed, arguing that he was denied the right to present a defense to the methamphetamine-related charges.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cooper, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership