Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Beaudoin v. Texaco, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of North Dakota
653 F. Supp. 512 (1987)


Facts

Mark Beaudoin (plaintiff) was an employee of Wood Wireline (Wireline). Texaco, Inc. (Texaco) (defendant) hired Wireline to conduct a pressure gradient check at one of Texaco’s oil wells in North Dakota. Beaudoin and a co-worker arrived at the Texaco site before dawn. No artificial lights were erected to aid the workers. Beaudoin began uncoiling wire from a large spool when he was struck in the eye by the end of the wire. As a result, Beaudoin became legally blind in one eye. A Texaco employee instructed to supervise the work arrived after the incident occurred. Beaudoin filed a negligence suit in federal district court against Texaco. Beaudoin argued that Texaco had acted negligently in requiring the work to be performed in the dark without the aid of lights and in failing to supervise the work properly. Texaco claimed that Beaudoin was negligent in handling the wire. Wireline was immune from liability under North Dakota law and was not a named defendant. The jury found damages of over $44,000 and apportioned the negligence among the parties, namely 60 percent to Wireline, 30 percent to Beaudoin, and 10 percent to Texaco. The issue before the court is how to render a judgment.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Van Sickle, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.