Beavers v. Lamplighters Realty
Oklahoma Court of Appeals
556 P.2d 1328 (1976)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Larry Beavers (plaintiff) contacted Lamplighters Realty, Inc. (Lamplighters) (defendant) about buying a house that Lamplighters had listed for sale. Beavers toured the house with agent Norma Ray and offered to buy it for $34,500. This offer was rejected. A few days later, Beavers called Lamplighters again and talked to a different agent, Jim Taylor. Taylor told Beavers that if Beavers wanted to buy the house, he needed to act quickly because the house’s builder was on his way to the realty office to buy the house for $37,000. Beavers asked Taylor to confirm that Taylor was referring to Paul Good, the house’s builder. Taylor confirmed that he was talking about Good and told Beavers that he had only one hour before Good came in with a check. Beavers then panicked and agreed to pay $37,250 for the house, believing it must be worth that much if the builder was willing to pay $37,000. The house was sold to Beavers for $37,250. After the sale, Beavers met Paul Good at a neighbor’s house. Beavers learned that Good had considered putting in an offer on the house Beavers purchased. However, Good had believed the house was worth only in the low thirties and had never actually made any offer. Beavers sued Lamplighters for the tort of fraudulent inducement, arguing that Taylor’s misrepresentation about the higher offer from Good had caused Beavers to pay more for the house than he would have without the false information. The trial court dismissed Beavers’s claim. Beavers appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brightmire, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.