Becerra v. Expert Janitorial

332 P.3d 415 (2014)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

Becerra v. Expert Janitorial

Washington Supreme Court

332 P.3d 415 (2014)

Facts

Expert Janitorial, LLC (defendant) contracted with Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. (Fred Meyer) to provide maintenance and janitorial services in Fred Meyer grocery stores. Expert Janitorial did not have its own janitorial employees but instead subcontracted independent janitorial-service companies to provide and supervise the workers who cleaned the stores. Carolina Becerra and others (workers) (plaintiffs) worked as night-shift janitors in Fred Meyer stores. The workers, who regularly worked more than 40 hours per week, were classified as independent contractors and did not receive overtime compensation. The workers sued Expert Janitorial and Fred Meyer, alleging that Expert Janitorial and Fred Meyer were joint employers and were liable to the workers under the Washington Minimum Wage Act (MWA) even though there was no formal employment relationship between the workers and Expert Janitorial or Fred Meyer. The trial court considered four factors to determine whether a joint-employment relationship existed, including whether the alleged joint employers (1) had the power to hire and fire, (2) supervised and controlled work schedules or employment conditions, (3) determined compensation rates and methods, and (4) maintained employment records. The trial court found that no joint-employment relationship existed and granted summary judgment to Expert Janitorial and Fred Meyer. The workers appealed, and the appellate court reversed. Fred Meyer and Expert Janitorial then appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (González, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership