Beckingham v. Hodgens

[2003] EWCA Civ 143 (2003)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Beckingham v. Hodgens

England and Wales Court of Appeal
[2003] EWCA Civ 143 (2003)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Robert Hodgens (defendant) was the leader of the Bluebells, a musical group. Hodgens hired professional fiddler Robert Beckingham (plaintiff), known professionally as Bobby Valentino, as a session musician for a recording session at which the Bluebells recorded their own version of the classic song “Young at Heart” (the song). Hodgens composed most of the music for the Bluebells’ version of the song, but Valentino wrote the violin part, including a memorable and catchy violin riff that was used multiple times throughout the Bluebells’ version of the song. Valentino subsequently claimed a share of royalties for the song, arguing that he was a joint author. Hodgens countered, arguing that Valentino could not be classified as joint author because Hodgens and Valentino did not have a joint intent to create a joint work at the time they composed and recorded the Bluebells’ version of the song. The trial court ruled for Valentino, holding that Valentino’s contribution, namely the violin part, was significant and original, and that Valentino’s contribution was not separate from Hodgens’s. As used in English copyright law, the phrase “not separate” means that two or more joint authors collaborated on a common design. The trial court also specifically rejected Hodgens’s argument that a joint intent to create a joint work was a requirement for a finding of joint authorship. Hodgens appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership