United States Supreme Court
425 U.S. 341 (1976)
Beckwith (defendant) was suspected of criminal tax fraud by the Internal Revenue Service. The service dispatched investigative agents to meet Beckwith at his home. Prior to interviewing Beckwith, the agents informed him of his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and his right to be represented by an attorney. Beckwith consented to the interview. After the interview, Beckwith and the agents traveled separately to Beckwith’s place of employment in order for the agents to inspect certain documents. The agents informed Beckwith that he was not legally obligated to provide the documents voluntarily. Beckwith consented to provide the documents. Beckwith was convicted of tax crimes in the federal district court. Beckwith appealed and the appellate court upheld the conviction. Beckwith petitioned the Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Concurrence (Marshall, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.