Beer Garden v. State Liquor Authority
New York Court of Appeals
590 N.E.2d 1193 (1992)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Beer Garden, Inc. (plaintiff) had a license for the sale of alcoholic beverages issued by the New York State Liquor Authority (SLA) (defendant). The SLA issued Beer Garden a notice initiating a proceeding to determine whether Beer Garden’s license should be revoked due to disturbances on its premises. The SLA issued a second notice to Beer Garden initiating proceedings to suspend Beer Garden’s license for selling alcoholic beverages to a minor. The SLA issued a third notice scheduling an interview in connection with the first notice. Sharon L. Tillman, counsel for SLA, issued all three notices. Pursuant to SLA regulations, an administrative law judge (ALJ) conducted hearings on the revocation and suspension proceedings and found evidence sustained the charges. The ALJ referred the case to the Commissioners of the SLA for final determination. Shortly thereafter, Tillman became an SLA Commissioner. The Commissioners, including Tillman, adopted the ALJ’s findings and voted to revoke Beer Garden’s license. Beer Garden petitioned for reconsideration and sought that Tillman recuse herself from participating in the decision based on her role as SLA counsel at the hearings. Tillman refused to recuse herself. The Commissioners sustained the determination. Beer Garden brought a proceeding challenging the revocation. The Appellate Division held Tillman’s refusal to recuse herself mandated Beer Garden’s petition to be granted. SLA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.