Begleiter v. Department of Defense [Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief]
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
No. 1:04-cv-01697 (EGS) (2004)

- Written by Laura Julien, JD
Facts
[Ed’s note: The casebook excerpt is not a court decision with a rule of law and a holding, but a complaint for declaratory relief. The complaint is summarized below.] Ralph Begleiter (plaintiff) was a journalism professor and foreign media correspondent. Begleiter filed a federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the release of still photographs and videos from Dover Air Force Base. Specifically, Begleiter sought photographs and videos depicting the arrival and the memorial ceremonies of deceased military personnel. Begleiter asserted that these materials were necessary in order to educate the public on matters of foreign policy and as part of his academic research. The Department of Defense (DOD) (defendant) initially released 361 photographs. However, prior to fulfilling the remainder of Begleiter’s request, the DOD asserted that the 361 photographs had been released in error and that no additional documents would be provided. The DOD adopted this position because of a 1991 DOD policy that prohibited the news media from capturing images of the coffins of deceased soldiers at military facilities. However, since the 1991 policy was adopted, the DOD has made numerous exceptions and had allowed the media to cover certain events. Additionally, the DOD had also occasionally directly released similar photographs to the media on its own accord. Begleiter filed for injunctive and declaratory relief, specifically requesting a finding that the DOD’s refusal to release the requested records violated FOIA.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.