Behlar v. Hanlon

199 F.R.D. 553 (2001)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Behlar v. Hanlon

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
199 F.R.D. 553 (2001)

Facts

Behlar (plaintiff) filed a personal-injury case against Hanlon (defendant) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. During discovery, Behlar underwent a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 35 physical exam by Hanlon’s expert, Dr. Robert Keehn. Behlar then sought discovery of income earned and work done by Dr. Keehn regarding other Rule 35 exams of plaintiffs in personal-injury cases for insurance companies and defense attorneys. Behlar contended that Keehn had been a defense expert for insurance companies for more than 20 years and wanted the discovery to impeach Dr. Keehn’s credibility by establishing bias. Behlar specifically sought to discover the total income Dr. Keehn earned in the previous five years, the amount Dr. Keehn earned conducting Rule 35 exams, hours spent in that capacity, Dr. Keehn’s tax returns, a list of all insurance companies Dr. Keehn has been affiliated with, and a list of all cases in which Dr. Keehn provided his expert-witness services. Hanlon objected to the discovery.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Grimm, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 781,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership