Behlar v. Hanlon
United States District Court for the District of Maryland
199 F.R.D. 553 (2001)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Behlar (plaintiff) filed a personal-injury case against Hanlon (defendant) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. During discovery, Behlar underwent a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 35 physical exam by Hanlon’s expert, Dr. Robert Keehn. Behlar then sought discovery of income earned and work done by Dr. Keehn regarding other Rule 35 exams of plaintiffs in personal-injury cases for insurance companies and defense attorneys. Behlar contended that Keehn had been a defense expert for insurance companies for more than 20 years and wanted the discovery to impeach Dr. Keehn’s credibility by establishing bias. Behlar specifically sought to discover the total income Dr. Keehn earned in the previous five years, the amount Dr. Keehn earned conducting Rule 35 exams, hours spent in that capacity, Dr. Keehn’s tax returns, a list of all insurance companies Dr. Keehn has been affiliated with, and a list of all cases in which Dr. Keehn provided his expert-witness services. Hanlon objected to the discovery.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Grimm, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.