Belilos v. Switzerland
European Commission of Human Rights
10 E.H.R.R. 466, 479-83 (1988)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Mrs. Marlène Belilos (plaintiff) was convicted of participating in an unauthorized demonstration in Switzerland (defendant). After Belilos’s conviction, she filed an application with the European Commission of Human Rights (the commission), claiming that the procedure used by the Swiss government and its courts violated Belilos’s right to a fair trial, which is guaranteed by Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (the convention). Switzerland asserted that when it ratified the convention, Switzerland made an interpretive declaration that stated that the guarantee of a right to a fair trial as defined by the convention was intended solely to ensure ultimate control by the judiciary over the acts or decisions of the public authorities relating to such rights or obligations or the determination of such charges. Thus, Switzerland argued that the declaration operated as a reservation of the right to a fair trial as defined by the convention, and the commission must not exercise jurisdiction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.