Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Bell Lines, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
480 F.2d 710 (1973)


Facts

Bell Lines, Inc. (Bell) (plaintiff) was a trucking company that wanted to dispose of its old trucks and acquire new trucks. Bell refused an offer to trade its old trucks for new trucks from Mack Trucks, Inc. (Mack). Instead, Bell contracted to pay cash for Mack’s trucks. Bell then signed another contract for the cash sale of its old trucks to Horner Service Corporation (Horner). Without Bell’s knowledge, Mack and Horner had already arranged for Mack to buy Bell’s old trucks from Horner. On its books, Mack showed the sale to Bell and purchase from Horner as a trade-in of Bell’s old trucks for Mack’s new trucks. However, Bell’s books showed the sale and purchase as separate transactions. Bell claimed the cash price paid for the new trucks as its basis for tax depreciation deductions. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that the substance of Bell’s transaction was a nonrecognizable like-kind exchange under § 1031(a) of the federal tax code. As a result, the commissioner found that Bell’s depreciation must be based in part on the value of the old trucks. This would be to Bell’s long-term tax disadvantage. The commissioner assessed a deficiency against Bell. Bell paid the assessment and then sued the commissioner in federal district court for a refund. The district court ruled in Bell’s favor, and the commissioner appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Craven, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.