Bell v. Estate of Bell
New Mexico Supreme Court
181 P.3d 708 (2008)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Five months before he married Vivian Bell (plaintiff), Ralph M. Bell created a revocable trust and an accompanying pour-over will. The will devised Ralph’s entire estate to the trustee of the revocable trust. The trust provided that, upon Ralph’s death, the entire trust estate was to be distributed in equal shares to Ralph’s two children, Ralph Mack Bell (defendant) and Dixie Roberta Heckendorn (defendant). Neither the will nor the trust referred to Ralph’s intent to marry Vivian, neither instrument expressed Ralph’s intention that the instrument be effective notwithstanding a future marriage, and neither instrument included Vivian as a beneficiary of Ralph’s estate. After Ralph’s death, Vivian filed a petition requesting that the court declare her an omitted spouse and award her an intestate share of Ralph’s estate. Vivian also requested that the value of assets transferred by Ralph to the trust before his death be included in his estate for purposes of calculating and satisfying her intestate share. The trial court found that Ralph’s will had devised his entire estate to his children and that Vivian was therefore not entitled to an intestate share of the estate. Vivian appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Castillo, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.