Bell v. Streetwise Records, Ltd.
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts
640 F. Supp. 575 (1986)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Ricky Bell, Michael Bivins, Bobby Brown, Ronnie DeVoe, and Ralph Tresvant (the band) (plaintiffs) were members of a teenage boy band called New Edition. The band formed in 1981 and enjoyed a level of local success before being discovered by Maurice Starr. Starr wrote, recorded, and produced the band’s first single “Candy Girl.” Starr connected the band with the record label Streetwise Records (defendant), which bought the copyrights to and released “Candy Girl.” Simultaneously, Streetwise entered into individual recording contracts with each of the then-14-year-old band members. The contracts granted Streetwise the exclusive rights to the name New Edition. After gaining international success, the band obtained new management and disaffirmed their contracts with Streetwise. Streetwise revealed its intentions to release music under the name New Edition with five new performers and sought to obtain federal registration of the trademark for the name. The band filed suit, seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent Streetwise from going forward with releasing music under the name New Edition. Streetwise responded and likewise sought to enjoin the band from releasing new music as well.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Zobel, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.