Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Bellamy v. Cogdell

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
974 F.2d 302 (1992)


Facts

Bellamy (defendant) was charged with murder. More than a year before the start of Bellamy’s trial, his mother contacted a retired attorney who had previously represented Bellamy. A few months prior to trial, the attorney was subjected to disciplinary proceedings. During the disciplinary proceedings, a doctor submitted a letter to the disciplinary committee informing that the attorney was suffering from physical ailments and emotional stress that rendered him incompetent to participate in the proceedings. The disciplinary committee petitioned for the attorney’s immediate suspension. The attorney responded to the petition by stating that suspension was unnecessary because Bellamy’s case was the only case he was handling at the time. The attorney represented that he would hire a second attorney to assist him in Bellamy’s representation. The attorney sent an ex parte letter to the trial judge informing that his condition had improved and that he would be assisted by the second attorney during Bellamy’s trial. The second attorney was unable to provide assistance during Bellamy’s trial. At trial, Bellamy was found guilty and convicted. Two months after Bellamy’s conviction, his attorney was suspended from practice. Bellamy moved to vacate his conviction on grounds of ineffective representation. The state courts upheld Bellamy’s conviction and he appealed to the federal courts. The federal district court deferred to the state court’s factual finding that Bellamy’s attorney was competent at the time of trial and upheld his conviction. Bellamy appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Altimari, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Feinberg, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.