Bellavia Blatt & Crossett, P.C. v. Kel & Partners, LLC
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
151 F. Supp. 3d 287 (2015)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Bellavia Blatt & Crossett P.C. (Bellavia) (plaintiff) was a law firm that represented automobile and marine dealerships. TrueCar Inc. assisted consumers in purchasing automobiles. TrueCar retained Kel & Partners LLC (Kel) (defendant), managed by Kel Kelly (defendant), to provide public-relations services. Bellavia sued TrueCar on behalf of Bellavia’s automotive-dealership clients for false advertising and unfair competition. An industry publication published an article about the lawsuit and invited readers who had “an opinion” about the story to submit a letter to the editor or an online comment. Kelly posted a comment stating it was “sadly becoming true that to be genuinely successful in modern business you must, at some point, become the target of fraudulent litigation,” “[t]he law firm behind this suit has a reputation for making a living by opportunistically attempting to sue others,” “[w]ord of the street is they have been attempting to induce dealers to join this lawsuit for quite some time with the misleading promise of millions in reward,” and “what is being whispered throughout the auto industry is that participating dealers must pay thousands of dollars to participate, and the claims are just a fishing exercise.” Another contributor posted: “[I]n my opinion, you are spot on.” Bellavia sued Kel and Kelly, alleging that Kelly’s comment defamed Bellavia. Kel and Kelly moved for summary judgment, arguing that the posted comment was a protected statement of opinion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bianco, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.